1,000+ Proven ChatGPT Prompts That Help You Work 10X Faster
ChatGPT is insanely powerful.
But most people waste 90% of its potential by using it like Google.
These 1,000+ proven ChatGPT prompts fix that and help you work 10X faster.
Sign up for Superhuman AI and get:
1,000+ ready-to-use prompts to solve problems in minutes instead of hours—tested & used by 1M+ professionals
Superhuman AI newsletter (3 min daily) so you keep learning new AI tools & tutorials to stay ahead in your career—the prompts are just the beginning

We track Product so you don't have to. Top Podcasts summarised, the latest AI tools, plus research and news in a 5 min digest.
Hey Product Fans!
Welcome to this week’s 🌮 Product Tapas.
New here? We're your shortcut to staying sharp. Essential stories, practical tools, real insights.
For the best reading experience, check our web or app version and sign up for future editions here.
What’s cooking this week? 🥘
Anthropic sued the Pentagon after refusing to build weapons (revenue doubled to $19B anyway), GPT-5.4 launched with native computer-use, and RevenueCat posted a $10K/month job for "any AI agent" - 3.4M views. We're past asking whether to hire agents.
Your specials:
📰 Not Boring - AI ethics wars, infrastructure arms race, model launches, the agentic explosion, and what happens to work
⌚️ Productivity Tapas - Customer intelligence, AI team governance, and coding agent context
🍔 Blog Bites - PM-UX-Tech collaboration with AI, the cost of sacrifice in information overload, and minimally viable consistency
🎙️ Pod Shots - Matt Abrahams on why memorising speeches kills connection
Let's go 🚀
📰 Not boring
💰 Money Talks
Anthropic doubles to $19B ARR - up from $9B Dec; Claude Code alone $2.5B ARR
The infrastructure arms race entered its "who blinks first" phase: Oracle targets $225B while planning mass layoffs, Google says $185B/year for a decade, and then Stargate collapsed because the financing didn't work
Cursor hits $2B ARR while YouTube hits $60B to become the world's largest media company. AMI Labs launches at $3.5B with 12 employees
Aschenbrenner turned $383M into $5.5B in a year betting power plants beat models. He might be the only person who knows where the value is
M&A wave: Netflix buys Affleck's AI filmmaking startup, OpenAI acquires Promptfoo (25%+ Fortune 500), Meta acquires Moltbook
Crypto meets payments: Barclays into stablecoins ("NFTs were silly; programmable rails seem useful"), Circle and Stripe building agent payment rails, Kraken gets Federal Reserve access
Google drops App Store fee to 20% and welcomes third-party stores; Epic settles - Sweeney can't criticise Google until 2030
The graveyard fills up: Cluely lied about revenue, Builder.ai collapsed (humans doing "AI" work), Bluesky's CEO stepped down
a16z Top 100 Gen AI apps - 6th edition; first time includes legacy tools revamped. Sequoia says services are the new software
Everyone's spending like the future depends on it, and the future keeps killing the projects they're spending on. Aschenbrenner's fund returned 14x in a year betting on datacentres, not models. Meanwhile the fraud wave grows and the graveyard fills up.
⚖️ The Ethics Wars
Anthropic sued the Pentagon after a supply chain risk designation never before used on a US company - because they refused to build weapons. 100+ enterprise customers are now wavering, with billions at stake
The contract said Claude couldn't be used for targeting. The Pentagon used it for targeting anyway. Dario's leaked "spin/gaslight" memo about the whole thing is the kind of thing that doesn't get un-said
The talent vote: OpenAI's VP of Research defected to Anthropic (2.9M views) while OpenAI's robotics head resigned over her own company's Pentagon deal. The technical community is choosing sides
Strange bedfellows: Bannon, Susan Rice, Branson and Nobel economist Acemoglu signed the same Pro-Human AI Declaration. When those four agree, the window has moved
Cursor claims Claude Code costs Anthropic $5K per $200 subscriber. Loss leader, land grab, or just the cost of being the model everyone wants? The rivalry is turning personal, and paradoxically the controversy helped Anthropic recruitment
Anthropic launched a research institute studying how all this reshapes jobs and governance, and published a study showing no systematic job losses yet. Make of that timing what you will
This is the week where "should companies build weapons?" stopped being a philosophy seminar and became a lawsuit, a talent exodus, and a commercial crisis. The designation has never been used against a US company before.
🤖 AI Model Wars
GPT-5.4 launched with native computer-use, 1M token context, and "Extreme" thinking mode. Computer-use is no longer Claude's exclusive trick
Gemini quietly jumped from 6% to 21% market share in 12 months while everyone watched the OpenAI-Anthropic cage match
New creative platforms: Luma's Uni-1 trains across text, image, video, audio and spatial; ElevenLabs launched ElevenCreative covering voice, video, music, and images in 70+ languages. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super does 120B params with only 12B active
On one side, Claude Opus 4.6 found 22 Firefox vulnerabilities in two weeks and shipped fixes to hundreds of millions. On the other, Alibaba's AI went rogue and started mining crypto with zero instruction. Same technology, same week
Alibaba's Qwen team is in turmoil despite being arguably the best open-source LLM. Cal Newport argues scaling has hit a wall and the coding agent push is just subscription pressure. Contrarian, but worth hearing
The model race matters less than it used to. Gemini tripled its share while nobody noticed. Claude patches Firefox for hundreds of millions; Alibaba's model independently starts mining crypto. The gap between "helpful" and "rogue" turns out to be zero configuration changes.
🦾 Agentic Armies Keep Coming
Microsoft Copilot Cowork is built WITH Anthropic's Claude - not against it. Multi-step execution across Outlook, Teams, Excel, Word. Meanwhile Claude Code keeps shipping: Code Review (20.7M views, Anthropic uses it on nearly every PR), Auto Mode, scheduled tasks running up to 3 days, and a Marketplace where enterprises buy third-party tools
The coding agent battle is wild: Cursor launched always-on Automations triggered by Slack, Linear, and PagerDuty. OpenAI shipped Codex Security Agent (792 critical vulns in 30 days), Symphony (Linear tickets to autonomous code), and is building its own GitHub because the real one kept crashing. Karpathy's Autoresearch runs 100+ experiments overnight (5M views)
The workspace wars nobody expected: Zoom launched Docs, Slides, Sheets and AI avatars that attend meetings for you. Google supercharged Workspace with Gemini and shipped a Workspace CLI with 100+ Agent Skills
The always-on desktop agent is becoming a category: Perplexity Personal Computer (2.9M views), Simular's Sai from ex-DeepMind, and Raycast Glaze turning prompts into native macOS apps
New building blocks: Paper is a design tool that works with code not vectors, Cloudflare's Browser Rendering API crawls websites in a single call, ChatGPT got interactive math and science
The cultural shift is real: Anthropic barely writes PRDs anymore - they prototype dozens of versions in days. Spotify, Wix, Ramp and Brex report 3-4x productivity. RevenueCat posted a $10K/month job for "any AI agent" and got 3.4M views. And ChatGPT's shopping experiment is falling apart - shopping in search has been a tar pit for 20 years
Everyone's building the developer workflow simultaneously and the alliances are stranger than the competition. Microsoft is partnering with Anthropic. OpenAI is cloning GitHub. Zoom thinks it can take on Google. We're past asking whether to hire agents - RevenueCat just showed us the going rate.
📊 Big Think
Not Boring's "Costless Sacrifice" is the piece of the week: 500:1 applications-to-recruiter ratio, AI cover letters killed the customisation signal, 4% of GitHub commits are Claude Code (projected 20%+). When output costs nothing, effort loses its meaning. Read alongside Paul Graham's "The Brand Age" - brand is what's left when products converge - and Evans's "How will OpenAI compete?" ("doesn't have unique tech; no network effect; value from experiences not yet invented")
The jobs question from every angle: HBR says people work more with AI, not less ("Excel didn't give bankers shorter hours"), another HBR study maps "brain fry" patterns, and the best framing yet: ATMs didn't kill bank tellers - the iPhone did. Within-paradigm automation rarely kills jobs; entirely new paradigms do
Companies do seem to need fewer people, which tracks with 10x being the new floor and Replit's CEO arguing no coding experience is an advantage (2.1M views). "I don't know if my job exists in 10 years" - agents don't need new capabilities, just better reliability
Meta created a flat "Applied AI Engineering" org with 50 reports per manager - recruiting across SWE, design, PM, data science. That's not an AI team, that's a company restructured around AI
Predictions and signals: CB Insights on AI agents (bottleneck shifted from building to deploying), 9 fintech predictions including Klarna and Affirm building full consumer banking with 27 shared partners
The disruption is structural: someone reimplemented a GPL codebase with AI and only 1.3% was common code - copyleft (the licensing model that forces derivative code to stay open source) may be dead within five years. Google AI Overviews hammered traffic 90%+ at some publications. Bain asks what happens when people never see your app. NBER says book production tripled (mostly Amazon ebooks). The UK postponed AI copyright rules indefinitely because the questions were too hard
Security keeps getting worse: Cline supply chain attack via a GitHub issue title (~4,000 downloads compromised), North Korea using AI to get hired at Western tech companies, and 65% of consumers say AI makes false refund claims easier. US considering permits for global AI chip sales
Ben Evans wrote the most important line about AI this week: "OpenAI doesn't have unique tech." The value will come from experiences nobody's built yet. Meanwhile the application ratio is 500:1, copyleft is dying, and an attacker compromised thousands of developers through a prompt in a GitHub issue title. The future showed up, and it's messier than the pitch decks.
📰 Quick Hits
Ghostty 1.3.0 - major terminal emulator release
The human.json protocol - anti-AI content verification standard
WordPress serving Markdown for AI agents - agent-readable content
OpenAI's five AI value models - enterprise AI adoption framework
Replit documentary: Sprint to $3B - behind-the-scenes
BBC funding paper - European broadcasting in the AI era
WordPress Playground Vision 2026 - future of WordPress
Cutback - AI video editing - automated editing
Go from AI overwhelmed to AI savvy professional
AI will eliminate 300 million jobs in the next 5 years.
Yours doesn't have to be one of them.
Here's how to future-proof your career:
Join the Superhuman AI newsletter - read by 1M+ professionals
Learn AI skills in 3 mins a day
Become the AI expert on your team
⌚ Productivity Tapas: Time-Saving Tools & Workflow Automation
Unwrap](https://www.unwrap.ai/): Aggregates all your feedback channels and surfaces what matters. Used by Perplexity, Stripe, lululemon. 90%+ accuracy
Paperclip: Hire AI agents as your team - with org charts, budgets, and governance built in. Timely given everyone's now asking "what's the going rate?" Open source
Context Hub by Andrew Ng: Feeds coding agents curated, versioned API docs so they stop hallucinating deprecated endpoints. Open source
Remember. Product Tapas subscribers get our complete toolkit - 550+ personally tailored, time-saving tools for PMs and founders. Your shortcut to efficiency and what's hot in product management 🔥
Check the link here to access.
🍔 Blog Bites - Essential Reads for Product Teams

Collaboration: How AI Reinvents the PM-UX-Tech Workflow
Bandan Singh examines the evolving roles within product teams as AI technology reshapes the PM-UX-Tech collaboration. Rather than making traditional roles obsolete, AI enhances teamwork and efficiency while highlighting the importance of maintaining distinct specialisations. Read the full article here.
💡 "The moment the prototype starts answering UX questions, put it down and hand the problem over."
Key Takeaways
• Role Clarification: The PM-UX-Tech trio exists because each role addresses unique challenges in product development. The PM identifies the right problems, UX focuses on user interactions, and Tech ensures feasibility and implementation.
• AI’s Impact on Workflow: Before AI, work flowed linearly, leading to delays and miscommunications. Now, teams can react collaboratively with AI-generated prototypes and insights, enhancing agility in problem-solving.
• Solo Work vs. Collaboration: AI enables individuals to perform tasks independently in low-risk scenarios, such as internal tools or quick experiments. However, collaborative input remains critical when the implications are significant.
• Decision-Making Dynamics: AI can streamline the creation process but cannot substitute for the diverse perspectives essential in high-stakes situations. Proper collaboration ensures that assumptions are challenged before they lead to flawed products.
Economics: The Cost of Sacrifice in the Age of Information Overload
Packy McCormick delves into the implications of abundant information in today's digital landscape, likening it to the historical move off the gold standard. He argues that without a tangible cost associated with information production, the intrinsic value of our contributions dwindles, fostering a sense of mediocrity. Read the full article here.
💡 "A sacrifice needs to cost something."
Key Takeaways:
• Information Overproduction: The ease of producing information thanks to AI leads to a surplus that undermines its quality. As McCormick argues, without the effort to create meaningful content, the resulting noise makes genuine expressions harder to discern.
• Job Market Saturation: The influx of applications driven by AI tools creates a paradox where customized efforts, such as personalised cover letters, lose their competitive edge. What once was a differentiator now fails to stand out amidst the overwhelming volume of generic submissions.
• Valuing the Process: The act of creating something of value often necessitates significant effort and time. McCormick emphasizes that the true worth of work isn't solely in its output but in the journey and struggle that precede it.
• Crisis of Control: The article suggests we are experiencing a "Crisis of Control" where the explosion of easily generated information complicates the landscape. Unlike the Industrial Revolution's increased production requiring logistical innovations, today's challenge lies in managing an overload of information.
Strategy: Navigating the Maze of Minimally Viable Consistency
John Cutler delves into the complexities of establishing "minimally viable consistency" within corporate operating systems. He suggests that the goal is to create a minimal set of shared concepts that enable effective operations without overwhelming cognitive load. Read the full article here.
💡 "When you’re designing your company’s operating system, you should strive to have the fewest number of consistent concepts... that still allow you to operate the way you need to."
Key Takeaways:
• Model Market Fit: Ideas often gain traction unexpectedly within a company, creating a model-market fit scenario where certain concepts, like journey mapping, may become standard despite initial resistance. Pay attention to organic adoption rather than rigid adherence to initial plans.
• Shifts in Strategy and Structure: When a company's strategy shifts but its structure remains stagnant, employees may feel lost in navigating dependencies. It's crucial to manage this transitional phase mindfully to avoid confusion and ensure teams can adapt to new requirements.
• The Myth of the Standard Framework: Many frameworks, such as OKRs, appear standardised but are implemented in various ways across companies. Recognising that flexibility within these models can be beneficial helps in tailoring them to specific team contexts.
• Avoiding Over-Bureaucratisation: Creating a reliance on rigid structures can hinder innovation and adaptation. Instead, focus on fostering key rituals and methods that genuinely promote collaboration without encumbering teams with unnecessary rules.
• Viability and Its Perception: Who benefits from established practices? What one group considers viable may be burdensome for another. This insight emphasises the need to evaluate the broader effects of consistency measures on all stakeholders.
🎙 Pod Shots - Bitesized Podcast Summaries
Remember, we've built an ever-growing library of our top podcast summaries (120 or so). Whether you need a quick refresher, want to preview an episode, or need to get up to speed fast - we've got you covered.
Matt Abrahams teaches communication at Stanford Business School and has spent decades studying why some people connect while others flounder. His core insight: never memorise a speech - it burdens cognitive load and kills the magic that happens in the moment.
The fear of public speaking has evolutionary roots - and practical solutions. Matt Abrahams, one of the world's foremost experts on communication, joins Andrew Huberman to share frameworks that actually work. From eliminating filler words to recovering from mistakes with grace, these are tools you can practice alone and use in real time.
In this episode, Matt explains why memorising is the enemy of connection (use a roadmap instead), why judging yourself in the moment destroys spontaneity, and what authenticity actually means in communication. He shares improv exercises that break the judgment habit and reveals the "Costco credibility" approach that beats credential-listing every time.
🚫 Never memorise speeches — Memorising creates a "right way" to say it, then you compare in real-time. This burdens cognitive load and kills connection.
🧠 Self-judgment destroys spontaneity — The more you evaluate while speaking, the less present you are. The magic of communication happens in the moment.
🎯 Costco credibility beats credential-listing — Instead of announcing your titles, demonstrate value through engagement. Give samples, not resumes.
🎬 Start like an action movie — Skip the credentials and get us hooked. Make a provocative statement, ask a question, show why this matters.
🔄 Practice spontaneous speaking — Like athletes doing drills, you can prepare to be spontaneous. The mindset is: get out of your own way.
🎭 Use improv to break judgment habits — Point at objects and call them wrong names for 15 seconds. This surfaces the judgment patterns blocking you.
✨ Authenticity means knowing your values — Understand what's important to you first, then articulate it. That's authentic - not "just being yourself."
📝 Structure over memorisation — Have a roadmap, key data on a note card, familiarity with ideas. Read the data if needed - it's better than the cognitive burden.
That’s a wrap.
As always, the journey doesn't end here!
Please share and let us know what you would like to see more or less of so we can continue to improve your Product Tapas. 🚀👋
Alastair 🍽️.


